Hyperlink Legend · E-mail story · Comments · iPod friendly version · Print friendly version

Police involved in late-night standoff
1 person shot, 12 arrested in incident
by Jimmy Myers
Wednesday, August 6, 2008
Special Response Team members Sgt. Billy Paul Miller and Capt. Jeff Wilson survey the scene next to a house where Tuesday’s standoff occurred.

Bob Heater/St. Joe Now

Special Response Team members Sgt. Billy Paul Miller and Capt. Jeff Wilson survey the scene next to a house where Tuesday’s standoff occurred.

The St. Joseph Police Department is piecing together Tuesday morning events that led to a person being shot and a dozen people being arrested.

Police received a call at 12:39 a.m. reporting that several armed individuals were at 2118 Jules St. The situation culminated in a swarm of officers from the Police Department and the Buchanan County Sheriff’s Department working the scene until after dawn.

Capt. Kevin Castle, spokesman for the St. Joseph Police Department, wouldn’t say why the group of Hispanics and black men were gathered at the residence, but early

accounts from officers on the scene pointed to a possible drug deal gone bad, according to a report from St. Joe Now. Officers confiscated several weapons and narcotics in the residence.

In a sweep of the home, a Hispanic male was found with a gunshot wound to the leg. He was taken to Heartland Regional Medical Center, where he was treated and released and then arrested along with several other men and at least one woman.

A member of the police department’s Special Response Team received stitches in his hand as a result of injuries sustained while clearing the home.

Officials charged five people Tuesday with burglary and seven with possession of a controlled substance. Those charged with burglary are: Jose A. Ojeda, 22; Lorenzo M. Rucker, 18; Edwin D. Dennis, 21; Jairo Camacho, 32; and Hector G. Camacho, 30.

Those charged with possession of a controlled substance are: Miguel Villegas-Cortez, 20; Agrasiano A. Davila, 21; Amber D. Ringot, 20; Socorro J. Rodriguez, 18; Adrian Ocon, 25; Daniel M. Ocon, 20; and Elderandrain Casaredz, 30.

All individuals face jail time.

Jimmy Myers can be reached

at jimmym@npgco.com.

Comments
This story has 13 comments. Click here to join in on the discussion.
Story Tools
Hyperlink Legend
E-mail story
Print friendly version
iPod friendly version

Today's Top Headlines
Smurfit workers go on strike
Cotter takes his wings to state post
Raises, insurance in doubt for county employees
Senator wants to dampen river parties
U.S. Bank robbed on Belt
Posted by mom2809 on August 6, 2008 at 9:25 a.m.

This comment was removed by the site staff.

Posted by jkmch on August 6, 2008 at 11:57 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Sec. 569.010(8). When a person has the consent of a resident to enter the home, he is not guilty of burglary, regardless of what other crimes he may have committed therein. State v. Chandler, 635 S.W.2d 338, 341 (Mo. banc 1982).

they are charged wth 1st degree burglary....They had consent of going in the home...

Posted by jkmch on August 6, 2008 at 11:59 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Would we consider these guys heroes? They helped our police go to a home that was never suspect for drugs, and now our enforcement gets credited for the bust. If it wasn't for them, those dealers would be filling up our town with filth

Posted by bryan3506 on August 6, 2008 at 7:50 p.m. (Suggest removal)

They were all charged with possession smart one, so we did remove the filth. Way to clean house SJPD!

Posted by StJoeMoe on August 6, 2008 at 10:33 p.m.

This comment was removed by the site staff.

Posted by proud_mexican on August 6, 2008 at 11:14 p.m.

This comment was removed by the site staff.

Posted by proud_mexican on August 6, 2008 at 11:15 p.m.

This comment was removed by the site staff.

Posted by jkmch on August 7, 2008 at 10:13 a.m. (Suggest removal)

bryan3506, learn how to read, not all of them were charged with possession smart one...

Posted by proud_mexican on August 7, 2008 at 1:55 p.m.

This comment was removed by the site staff.

Posted by rmap on August 7, 2008 at 4:49 p.m.

This comment was removed by the site staff.

Posted by hugocc on September 8, 2008 at 12:32 p.m. (Suggest removal)

JKMCH is right, I just checked my Business Law book. I hope Jairo and Hector Camacho, are charged solely on the fact that they were victims of circumstance.


Post a comment

Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them.

Rules: We don't allow comments that degrade others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual orientation or disability. Epithets, abusive language and obscene comments will not be tolerated... nor will defamation. Brief quotes are okay as long as the source is given. Blatent cutting and pasting is not acceptable.

Robust, even heated debate we like. Straying off-topic or flaming, we don't. Please read our user agreement.

Requires free stjoenews.net registration
.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:


Business
Location


Iframe Content