Hyperlink Legend · E-mail story · Comments · iPod friendly version · Print friendly version

Council sides with developers
Streetlight standards to change
by Joe Blumberg
Tuesday, October 7, 2008

Homebuilders more than got their way Monday night when the City Council loosened streetlight standards and scolded City Manager Vince Capell.

Streetlights on residential streets are now back to a pre-2004 standard — basically a light at every intersection, plus a light in between if the block is longer than 400 feet.

“Because of the way developments run, you’re very rarely going to have lights 400 feet apart,” said Todd Griffee, an attorney for the Greystone housing development, which initiated the push for the change.

Between 2004 and Monday, the residential standard was based on lumens on the ground rather than distance between lights. Developers said that standard amounted to about one light every 160 feet. Larger “arterial” and “collector” streets still will rely on the lumens standard.

The council voted 8-1 in favor of the change. The volunteer Planning Commission unanimously supported the change. Three residents of the Wilshire Place neighborhood, which has the pre-2004 standards, said they are pleased with the amount of lighting.

Councilman Bill Falkner commended Councilman Gary Roach for “staying on top of” the issue. Mr. Roach two weeks ago told Mr. Capell he was disappointed with the lack of compromise on the issue.

“I think a lot of this lies on city staff for failing to do what we said to do, and I thought that’s the way this was supposed to work,” Mr. Falkner said, referring to the council-manager relationship.

Donna Jean Boyer, who voted against the change, said the Planning Commission didn’t offer any compromise. But at the Planning Commission’s meeting, city staff said there could be no change to the proposal.

“We probably need to look at why the Planning Commission didn’t have (any alternatives),” Councilman Mike Hirter responded to Ms. Boyer. “Because staff presented only one proposal to them.”

Mr. Roach said city staff should put more emphasis on getting things done instead of finding reasons not to. He went further to suggest that city staff purposely proposed the pre-2004 standard of 400 feet to give council a bad option.

“I think 400 feet was put on the agenda thinking it would be voted down,” Mr. Roach said. “It kind of backfired.”

Mr. Capell then asked for a chance to respond. He said he had left a meeting when council told staff to compromise on the light issue, and he repeated Ms. Boyer’s suggestion that developers had declined to compromise with the Planning Commission.

He also accused council members of holding meetings with developers without inviting staff. He also told Mr. Roach that the earlier meeting in question “wasn’t even your committee” — implying that the issue should’ve fallen under Ms. Boyer’s Planning & Zoning Committee instead of Mr. Roach’s Streets & Infrastructure Committee.

Mr. Roach shook his head and disagreed.

“It’s probably irrelevant whose committee it was,” Mr. Hirter replied.

Mr. Hirter, Mr. Roach, Mr. Falkner, Mayor Ken Shearin, Roger Baker, Mike Bozarth, Barbara LaBass and Joyce Starr voted in favor of the change. Ms. Boyer was opposed.

Joe Blumberg can be reached at joeblumberg@npgco.com.

Comments
This story has 7 comments. Click here to join in on the discussion.
Story Tools
Hyperlink Legend
E-mail story
Print friendly version
iPod friendly version

Today's Top Headlines
Smurfit-Stone workers strike
Law enforcement officers discount 'Mexican mafia initiation'
Number of homeless students on the rise
Longtime Christmas tree salesman remembered
Obama to select 4 more Cabinet members
Posted by gr8fan on October 7, 2008 at 8:47 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Once again, money talks in Joetown. I commend Ms. Boyer for putting public safety first instead of bending over to the pressures of the "big money" contractors. As for Mr. Roach, the next election is too soon to get him out. He is a rebel rouser if ever there was one and just loves to hear himself talk. Please attend a council meeting sometime and you too, can be embarrassed to be represented by such a pampas, opinionated individual.

Posted by Mizzou on October 7, 2008 at 9:26 a.m. (Suggest removal)

The problem lies in the fact that the city staff and the council very rarely seem to be able to work together to get things accomplished. Is this because ego's are too big? Probably. But if you look at the issues of not only this street light issue, but the issue with Country Club Village, there was no compromise on either side of the issues. Until the city staff and council learn to work together, this town will remain in the past with no hope of looking to the future.

Posted by heritage on October 7, 2008 at 9:39 a.m. (Suggest removal)

only one choice? say it isn't so? i regret that i wasn't there to applaud mr. roach and the other councilmembers for finally making capell toe the line. mr. capell consistently blocks council attendance at STAFF meetings, but has the temerity to upbraid a councilmember for speaking to their constituents without presence of STAFF? mr. roach has had a "gotcha" moment........the light dawns in the wilderness, could our fearless leader ( that would not be the mayor) be leading us down the primrose path? could this have been going on for the last two years and WE NEVER NOTICED IT? is the council being treated like a child who is only given two choices by a parent, one choice which we know the child will never want, the other the choice the Parent wants?

Posted by apmastrangelo on October 7, 2008 at 10:36 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Congratulations to the Mr. Mayor, and City Council for taking control of your elected responsibilities.
This particular matter was never about giving the store away in favor of developers but rather a common sense issue needing resolution.
I repeat a previous remark in response to the reported comments and complaints by the City Manager.
"...the mayor and council set policy and issue directives as deemed appropriate. The responsibility of any staff member, including the City Manager, is to comply without debate."
It appears the principles of how city government is to function is starting to be understood.

Posted by hcat on October 7, 2008 at 7:20 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Regardless of anyone's feelings about the current city manager and the current council, it's good to see that, for once, the council actually agreed on something without ripping each other to shreds! Congratulations and let's see if we can't make this a regular occurrence.


Post a comment

Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them.

Rules: We don't allow comments that degrade others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual orientation or disability. Epithets, abusive language and obscene comments will not be tolerated... nor will defamation. Brief quotes are okay as long as the source is given. Blatent cutting and pasting is not acceptable.

Robust, even heated debate we like. Straying off-topic or flaming, we don't. Please read our user agreement.

Requires free stjoenews.net registration
.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:


Business
Location


Iframe Content