Hyperlink Legend · E-mail story · Comments · iPod friendly version · Print friendly version

When it’s man vs. bear, I need backup weapon
by Jeff Leonard
Saturday, September 6, 2008

While preparing for an upcoming bowhunting trip for black bear, the owner of the lodge informed us that we may wish to carry a legal firearm along as a backup weapon, as we’d be hunting predominately on our own in very remote areas.

Call me naive, but as a newcomer to the world of bear hunting, in a worst-case scenario, the thought of going toe to toe with a 300- to 500-pound black bear with only a bow and arrow to defend myself didn’t sound too appealing.

Just the thought of climbing down from a tree stand in the dark in bear country and walking through the woods alone seemed reason enough for me to pursue the purchase of a backup weapon. Then the lodge owner calls and informs me to bring a ground blind because he planned on having me set up on a site that didn’t have any trees suitable for an elevated stand.

So let’s get this straight. He wants me, a newcomer to the bear woods, to sit at ground level mere yards away from a baited site with only a thin piece of camouflage material separating me from hundreds of pounds of teeth, muscle and claws. Obviously he doesn’t realize that I panic when a bear attacks me while playing Cabela’s Dangerous Game on my son’s Playstation.

That was all it took to put me in the market for a large-caliber handgun. I needed something to give me a little piece of mind and be capable of stopping or at least deterring a bear from chewing on this particular Missouri hunter. After all, up until now the only thing I’ve had to worry about when leaving the woods was crossing paths with an odiferous skunk.

While shopping for a handgun capable of handling these duties, I narrowed my search down to revolvers because of their tradition of dependability and, well, I’m a Clint Eastwood fan. Go ahead bear ... make my day!

The frugal side of me also had to add its input and noted that it seemed kind of silly to purchase a gun that most likely (or at least hopefully) will never get used in a defensive mode. After all, the chances of actually being attacked by a bear are, honestly, pretty darn slim.

This narrowed my search down even more as I decided if I were going to purchase a good handgun, I wanted something capable of pulling double duty as a whitetail deer gun around here with the addition of some fun afternoons at the firing range.

What I needed was a medium- to large-framed revolver with a minimum of a 6-inch barrel and preferably something capable of handling a scope.

When it comes to large-caliber handguns there’s a wide variety of choices from the ever-popular .357-magnum all the way up to the Smith and Wesson 500. Deciding which caliber will suit your needs best depends on factors such as cost, recoil, gun weight and feel, its purpose and many others.

For me the decision was easy. I’m going with a .357-magnum. While a .357 may be on the lower spectrum of take-down power in the realm of large revolvers, with the right loads it packs enough punch to take down nearly any North American big game animal, including black bear and whitetail deer.

That’s of course when taking only responsible and proper shot opportunities at reasonable distances for the load you’re carrying (for me 50 yards or less — like I said, I like a challenge).

I also chose the .357 because I enjoy going to the range for a day of shooting and can buy a box of 50 .38 special shells (which can be shot from a .357) for around $15 while the same number of shells for a S&W 500 could easily run upwards of $90 to $100.

While I have nothing against the larger calibers on the market, the .357 just seems to be a better overall fit for a beginning large-caliber enthusiast like myself.

Like many other age-old debates — Ford vs. Chevy, carbon arrows vs. aluminum, pump shotguns vs. autoloaders, paper vs. plastic — everyone has a different opinion and idea of what will meet their needs the best. The important thing is to figure it out, head outside and enjoy it.

Comments
This story has 5 comments. Click here to join in on the discussion.
Story Tools
Hyperlink Legend
E-mail story
Print friendly version
iPod friendly version

Today's Top Headlines
Smurfit workers go on strike
Cotter takes his wings to state post
Raises, insurance in doubt for county employees
Senator wants to dampen river parties
U.S. Bank robbed on Belt
Posted by stjoebear on September 6, 2008 at 12:15 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Not really sure how anyone can take enjoyment from killing such a beautiful animal as a bear. Want to get rid of a really dangerous animal go for a pedophile.

Posted by heritage on September 6, 2008 at 10:49 a.m. (Suggest removal)

maybe you will be the one who $#!+$ in the woods?

Posted by MichaelH on September 6, 2008 at 11:14 a.m. (Suggest removal)

What does the bear get?

Posted by Tigerstripe on September 6, 2008 at 11:45 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Having bowhunted hunted bears for a number of years in the Rockies, I would offer the following observations.

It is truly confusing to me that your outfitter wants you on the ground instead of a tree stand where you would be more difficult to detect. I would certaily raise that question to him.

Second, having been in a face to face confrontation with a wounded bear at seven yards, with a .44 Magnum handgun for backup, I quickly changed to a pump shotgun with a slug barrel and extended magazine using alternate loads of 000 buck and slugs.

That combination equals NO FEAR OF NO BEAR!

Posted by TrappinFool on September 6, 2008 at 9:11 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Do you plan on killing the bear or just making it mad? Come on, a .357 mag? Is that one for your wife?

Why not step up and be responsible and be a man and shoot at least a .44 mag? If you have a mad bear charging at you or attacking your ground blind, a .357 is just going to make it more mad.

You want knockdown power and it will take several rounds from a .44 mag to stop it and someone who knows what they are doing. Not some rookie with a pea shooter.


Post a comment

Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them.

Rules: We don't allow comments that degrade others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual orientation or disability. Epithets, abusive language and obscene comments will not be tolerated... nor will defamation. Brief quotes are okay as long as the source is given. Blatent cutting and pasting is not acceptable.

Robust, even heated debate we like. Straying off-topic or flaming, we don't. Please read our user agreement.

Requires free stjoenews.net registration
.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:


Business
Location


Iframe Content
  • More Headlines
  • Recently Discussed