Hyperlink Legend · E-mail story · Comments · iPod friendly version · Print friendly version

Most Missouri lawmakers oppose bailout measure
by Associated Press
Monday, September 29, 2008

WASHINGTON (AP) _ Most of Missouri's congressional delegation voted against the Wall Street bailout legislation.

The measure that Congressional leaders spent all weekend negotiating failed 228-205 in a mid-afternoon House vote Monday.

Five of Missouri's House members rejected the $700 billion rescue plan, while four came out for it.

Those favoring the bill include Republicans Roy Blunt and Jo Ann Emerson and Democrats Russ Carnahan and Ike Skelton.

Those opposing it include Republicans Kenny Hulshof, Sam Graves and Todd Akin. Democratic Reps. Williams Lacy Clay and Emanuel Cleaver also voted no.

Blunt, the No. 2 GOP leader, was part of the group that worked to negotiate a compromise.

The bailout plan is unpopular, but House leaders say it's necessary to prop up shaky financial institutions and free up frozen lines of credit.

Comments
This story has 3 comments. Click here to join in on the discussion.
Story Tools
Hyperlink Legend
E-mail story
Print friendly version
iPod friendly version

Today's Top Headlines
Smurfit workers go on strike
Cotter takes his wings to state post
Raises, insurance in doubt for county employees
Senator wants to dampen river parties
U.S. Bank robbed on Belt
Posted by apmastrangelo on September 29, 2008 at 6:31 p.m. (Suggest removal)

For the FIVE that opposed the bail-out bill I hope they will have justification for their action to constituents.
When the current economic dilemma gets worse, and it will, those not supporting some form of bail-out can explain what legislation they are going to propose in order to stabilize a already critical situation.
The conduct of these elected officials in dealing with this matter is a clear indicator as to whether they are doing their job and looking out for the country, or hiding out from making difficult decisions in order to protect their political back-sides.

Posted by apmastrangelo on September 29, 2008 at 7:54 p.m. (Suggest removal)

namajnin - You are exactly right. For the record I in principal do not like the bail-out concept but at this juncture it is the lesser of two evils. Once the bill provided for a recovery process and or insurance type design it became less objectionable.
I would like nothing better than to see every one of the SO-B's causing this mess put away at hard labor for a minimum of 50 years. At least then others ever having the same idea would have something to think about; unfortunately wish-full thinking.
One thing is certain "something" best happen soon or we are all in for a much longer down hill ride on this coaster.


Post a comment

Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them.

Rules: We don't allow comments that degrade others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual orientation or disability. Epithets, abusive language and obscene comments will not be tolerated... nor will defamation. Brief quotes are okay as long as the source is given. Blatent cutting and pasting is not acceptable.

Robust, even heated debate we like. Straying off-topic or flaming, we don't. Please read our user agreement.

Requires free stjoenews.net registration
.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:


Business
Location


Iframe Content