Congress continues its effort to pass health-care legislation before the autumn leaves turn, opponents calling the consideration too hasty and supporters regarding it as time-critical.
All signs point to debate of America's Affordable Health Choices Act before the August congressional recess.
Three House committees completed work Tuesday on the bill. A Senate panel also reported out its version. On Wednesday, President Obama insisted that the health care status-quo threatens the "financial stability" of America's families, businesses and government.
Northwest Missouri Congressman Sam Graves said Thursday he would oppose the measure because of its cost to small business, its expansion of government into health care and its potential to lessen the quality of medical treatment.
"I think this thing is going to cost a lot of jobs," said Mr. Graves, the top Republican on the House Small Business Committee.
The lawmaker referred to the measure's plan to raise taxes on upper-end earners in order to pay for the program, expected to cost in excess of $1 trillion. Such a intention, Mr. Graves said, would prompt business owners to limit expansion if nearing certain monetary thresholds.
He cited a National Federation of Independent Business study that government mandates of 50 percent employer premiums would result in 1.6 million job losses.
The legislator also countered the notion that health costs would come down because of increased competition. "The fact is you can't compete with the federal government," Mr. Graves said. "A lot of those options out there right now, private options, are going to go away."
Linda Nolan of St. Joseph, who helped plan recent Organizing for America events promoting health-care reform, said people have concerns about the cost of the program but cite the need for change.
"Many people are misconceiving that this is single-payer, socialized medicine, which it's not," she said. "It's a public option."
Survey work at the group's Day of Service proved revealing, Ms. Nolan added.
"The majority said they were happy with their insurance," she said, "but when we asked them what they had, the majority had Medicare, Medicaid or VA, which are all government programs."
Families USA, a 27-year-old health consumer organization based in Washington, released a report Wednesday indicating the escalating rate of Americans losing medical coverage.
It claimed 3,120 Missourians lose their health insurance benefits each month. In Kansas, the rate is 1,410 a month. The numbers make a good case for acting now on reform, said Ron Pollack, the group's executive director.
"(This report) shows that success in delaying health care reform comes with a huge price," he said in a conference call with reporters.
Mr. Graves said the Democratic leadership's rush to pass legislation in the House stems from timing of the summer break. When lawmakers face home-district constituents during the recess, he believes, they would face tough questions about the cost of the program.
Ken Newton can be reached
at kenn@npgco.com.



Share Your Thoughts
Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. We do not review every post or respond to every removal suggestion. Comments that threaten someone or degrade them on the basis of gender, race, class, national origin, religion or disability will be removed. Comments containing abusive, vulgar or sexually-oriented language will be removed. Comments that spread rumors or lies will be removed. Please discuss only what has been factually proven. Comments posted in all caps will be removed. Stay on topic! Brief quotes are okay as long as the source is given. Blatant cutting and pasting is not acceptable. Comments must be kept under 250 words or less. Stjoenews.net moderators also reserve the right to remove comments for any reason they deem worthy. Click here for our full user agreement.
WhoisJohnGalt says...
If they are dead set on doing this, the tax should be for all, not just a few. If everyone has a stake in this deal on the payer side, perhaps they will watch the services provided a bit closer. Besides, the "rich" don't have enough money to fund this scheme. I think a yearly surtax of 5,000 dollars per family, rich or poor, would just about cover it.
July 17, 2009 at 7:13 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
goobentrot says...
Public option by another definition would be called what? Federal insurance? For heavens sake not socialized medicine.If you were to find some pitfalls in your federal plan would your private plan take you back? Probably not.
July 17, 2009 at 8:07 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
Wright_Winger says...
V. P. Joe Biden's recent comments regarding the Obama healthcare proposal:
"We're doing things that we know are going to save you, your children and your grand children billions of dollars over the next years. But we're not able to prove it." (AARP Meeting - Virginia)
"Folks look, AARP knows and the people with me here today know, the president knows, and I know, that the status quo is simply not acceptable. It's totally unacceptable. And it's completely unsustainable. Even if we wanted to keep it the way we have it now. It can't do it financially.We're going to go bankrupt as a nation. Now, people when I say that look at me and say, 'What are you talking about, Joe? You're telling me we have to go spend money to keep from going bankrupt?' The answer is yes, that's what I'm telling you." (7/16/09 - Virginia, AARP Health Meeting)
-----------------------------------------------
Econ 101 -- Spend money to keep from going bankrupt? Guess I slept through that lecture.
July 17, 2009 at 8:16 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
weese says...
WhoIsJohnGalt - Are you saying that we pay 5000$ a year and get our healthcare covered ?
goobentrot - What's wrong with socialized medicine? Have you ever done your own research or are you just spewing out the rhetoric you see on FauxNews?
July 17, 2009 at 9:46 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
donaldo says...
thats the problem with this media blitz on this subject. fox. i dont think all can afford $5,000.00. i know the fat cat,s can and will before this is all done and said. the only thing i dont like is the fat cat,s will find a way to get to the frount of the line when we all have health care. they will think it is their right or somethying like that .i have heard that it is not right for the rich to pay more for this, i cant think of a more giving wonderful group of people that would be willing to do their fair share if only fox would say that it is a way for fat cat,s to show just who is who in the world of movers and shakers. it must be wonderfull to be able to give your fair share for a change after all these years of tax loop holes and hording your money in stock piles in the bank.you cant take it with you, you can give a little more to help the one,s in need.
July 17, 2009 at 10:48 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )